Thursday, April 23, 2020
Sex And Religious Morality Essays - Gender, Interpersonal Attraction
  Sex And Religious Morality  It has been said that the two most powerful drives in a human, besides the  practical need for food and shelter, are sex and religion. The sexual urge is  strong in nearly everyone, as advertisers of everything from chocolates to cars  can tell you, and the urge to worship the divine (by whatever name) is also  strongly present in many. In early religions and Neo-Paganism, sex was  celebrated as an affirmation of life. It was felt to be a foundational part of  the order of the world and of human nature. Therefore, separating it from  religion was unthinkable and a kind of contradiction in terms. Many who followed  the teachings of Jesus were converts from Pagan religions that used heterosexual  and homosexual activities as a means of worship. Religious Fundamentalists argue  that sexual acts outside a marriage are immoral-even then sex is only to be used  as a means for procreation and is not meant to be thoroughly enjoyed.    Homosexuality, according to them, is an abomination that has always been  condemned in the Bible. Fundamentalists are so devout in their religions they  become blinded to any other interpretation of the Bible other than the literal  views they believe. If this were not so, they might be more open to the fact  that the words "homosexual" and "homosexuality" were not part of the    Hebrew or Greek languages, because they were not coined until the 19th century.    Therefore, it is impossible that the original scriptures contained words  pertaining to something that did not exist. Such narrow-minded and hypocritical  convictions cause the Fundamentalists to show a hardness of heart to love,  compassion and service towards others?aspects that other religions embrace as  their highest priorities. Reverend Peter Gomes strives to teach groups like    Fundamentalists not to interpret the Bible literally?especially when abusing  passages to condemn issues such as homosexuality. He asks of people, when  reading the Bible, to ask not only what it says, but, "what did this mean when  it was written," and "what does it mean now?" because not many people  realize that the Bible was written by hundreds of people at different time  periods in languages that may no longer be used. It's groups such as the    Fundamentalists who are quick to condemn homosexuals as sinners. Because they  take passages so literally, it's easy for them to discriminate against, and  persecute gays and lesbians. Careful study will show that while the Bible does  condemn homosexual and heterosexual prostitution, it says nothing about loving,  committed homosexual relationships. Jesus himself never commented on  homosexuality, which makes one wonder whose concern it really was.    Unfortunately, many bible passages are taken out of context, or interpreted  without consideration for the cultural aspects associated with the time period  in which they were written. Also, there are many versions of the Bible that  reflect limited scientific knowledge, personal beliefs of the interpreters and  social beliefs of the times they were written. Personal biases and societies  prejudices have most certainly distorted the Bible's many translations. For  example: People use the passage about Sodom to condemn homosexuality as a sin  because the townsmen wanted to rape two angels visiting Lot. By looking closer,  one can see the men were not punished for homosexuality, but indeed for the sins  of pride, greed, and idolatry of Babylonian and Canaanite gods. Nothing about  homosexuality is mentioned?in fact, Lot offered the men his own two  daughters?indicating that the men were heterosexuals wanting to inflict  punishment in the form of rape upon the angels. In fact, homosexual rape was a  common form of punishment when men wanted to prove their dominance or influence  in any given situation. Also, passages from Leviticus are commonly used to  denounce homosexuals even though the word homosexual doesn't appear anywhere.    This was actually a code of Holiness used as a ritual manual for Islamic  priests. Christians are not bound by these rules and rituals, and if they insist  on using these passages to attack homosexuals they are also bound by the other  rules and rituals therein described. It forbids: - Sexual intercourse with a  woman during her menstrual cycle - Tattoos - Eating certain kinds of meats -    Wearing clothing made of more than one cotton blend - Men cutting their hair or  shaving their beards This code also endorses polygamy and requires Saturday to  be the holy day. Obviously it is unfair to condemn homosexuality, while ignoring  the fact that most Christians do not follow the rest of the rules outlined in  the Holiness Code of Leviticus. Although there's a lot of negative feedback  because of negative    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.